Evals & Lifecycle

Backtest every change
before you deploy.

Keep testing as you improve your agent team. Compare each candidate version against past work, inspect regressions before deployment, and restore a proven team version if a change underperforms.

CorinRevision review
Sample case dataQuote workflow · team v12 → v13
REVISION DIFF

What changed in the team?

01 / 04
Currentv12saved team revision
Candidatev13pricing model changed
Case set4reviewed examples
Regression1case needs inspection

One proposed assignment

v12 → v13
CURRENT · v12Pricing analyst

Model A

Saved team revision
CANDIDATE · v13Pricing analyst

Model B

Test before adoption
Intake and validation roles unchangedTeam handoffs unchanged
A revision identifies the whole team configuration used in each run.
Select a view or case to inspect the revision decision.

The test set

Include the cases that can change the decision.

Corin’s retained history gives you past tasks to revisit, including routine work and exceptions. Keep each case’s inputs and reviewed outcome together where one exists.

Backtest as you go: run the current and candidate team versions against the same cases as you refine the configuration. Compare reviewed outcomes, time, tokens, and cost, and define what counts as a regression before deploying the change.

QUOTE WORKFLOW · CASE SETSample data
01 / COVERAGE

Four different paths through one task.

Routine, incomplete, exception and urgent work belong in the same comparison.

Routine quote
Missing detail
Review exception
Urgent quote
CommonFollow-upReview
Change the lens to inspect the evaluation basis.
REVIEW EXCEPTION · TRACE COMPARISONSample data
01 / OUTCOME

Same aggregate. Different failure.

CURRENT · v12Accepted

Reviewer accepted the exception recommendation.

CANDIDATE · v13Correction

Reviewer asked for a correction on the same case.

Inspect the outputs and both traces before treating lower usage as an improvement.
Evaluate case-level changes, not only totals.

Read the regression

Find the case that got worse.

Two revisions can have the same number of accepted cases while failing on different work. The reviewed exception, not the average, determines whether this candidate is ready.

Open the traces for the case. Compare the model choice, inputs, tool calls and handoff before changing the team again.

Version and restore

Restore a proven team version.

Corin retains telemetry and relevant data after each task ends. The record shows what changed across revisions and how the team performed, so you can inspect a deployed change and restore an earlier whole-team revision.

This example changes one model, but the saved revision covers the whole agentic team. A failed candidate stays out of use; a later adopted revision can be restored to the prior team configuration if it regresses.

TEAM REVISION · DECISION PATHExample
REGRESSION IN THE TEST SET

Hold the current revision.

Do not replace v12 with v13 while the reviewed exception regresses.

v12Current
v13Held
Team configurationCase outcomesRun telemetry
The prior revision and its run history remain available.
Inspect both decision paths.

Decision record

Keep the comparison explainable.

01 / REVISION

What changed

Identify the team revisions and the proposed configuration change.

02 / CASES

What was tested

Keep the representative inputs and review criterion comparable.

03 / RESULT

What people decided

Save the reviewed outcomes, trace links and reason to adopt, hold or restore.

Build with Corin

Try a change on known work.

Run a working example, inspect its trace, and use representative cases to assess the next team revision.